+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Theories & Solutions (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-58.html)
+--- Thread: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against (/thread-4746.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Jorge_Stolfi - 29-05-2026
(29-05-2026, 03:42 PM)MarcoP wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The temptation to label as “errors” cultural expressions that are different from our modern point of view is always hard to resist.
Perhaps I need to clarify: those corrections in brown over the red text are not mine. They are there on the manuscript itself. So it is not me calling them errors, it was the Proofreading scribe.
In Post-Post-Post-Medieval manukeyboardscripts, one often see "their" spelled as "there", "it's" spelled as "its", "you're" as "your"... Should we see those "variants" as the (written) English language changing, or as errors made by people who are not completely fluent in it?
All the best, --stolfi
RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Grove - 30-05-2026
RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - MarcoP - 31-05-2026
RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - eggyk - 31-05-2026
RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - nablator - 31-05-2026
RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Jorge_Stolfi - 01-06-2026
RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - MarcoP - 01-06-2026
RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Jorge_Stolfi - 01-06-2026
RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - ErinaBee - 05-06-2026
RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - ololololo - 05-06-2026