![]() |
|
The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Theories & Solutions (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-58.html) +--- Thread: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against (/thread-4746.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
|
A page from the ORIGINAL Voynich Manuscript - Jorge_Stolfi - 06-07-2026 The following is a (black-and-white) image of page from the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (ZHB), an important Chinese medical encyclopedia: More precisely, this image is a scan of a a You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. made in the early 20h century of a copy of the Zenghe Bencao, block-printed sometime in the Song period (960-1279 CE). This massive encyclopedia was compiled privately in the late 1000s and then revised and published with state sponsorship in 1116 CE. At the time it listed 1748 medicinal substances with extensive commentaries by dozens of earlier authors. This image is probably from a somewhat later edition and may have a slightly different set. Among other sources, the ZHB quoted the whole text of the Shennong Bencao Jing (SBJ, the "Classic Materia Medica of the Divine Farmer"), a list of 365 medical substances and their indicatons, written round 300 BCE and attributed to the mythical emperor and Daoist god Shennong. In the ZHB prints that would be available in 1400 CE, the entries for those medicines opened with the SBJ entry in large white-on-black characters, interspersed and followed by all the later commentaries. Some very early additions and changes to the SBJ, which had come to be viewed part of it, were incorporated in this big white-on-black text. Some slightly later additions (before 500 CE) would be printed in large characters but black-on-white. All other commentaries and additions were in smaller black-on-white or white-on-black font. The text of the page above is about the root of the aconite plant, Aconitum carmichaelii. More specifically about the main branch of the fully developed root; the secondary branches and the young undivided root were covered in two separate entries. If I understand that image correctly, the leftmost 2/3 are the verso recto of a fold-out folio, and the rightmost 1/3 is on the recto verso of the next previous folio. (Note that in Chinese books the page reading order is opposite to that of Western books). EDIT:but maybe the left 2/3 are verso and recto of the same folio, photographically pasted side by side. It is claimed that the Starred Parags section (SPS) of the VMS is a fairly literal transcription of the large white-on-black hanzi from a print copy of the ZHE very much like this one; minus some parts, mostly information that would not have made sense outside China (or even in China). The full large white-on-black text on this page, in traditional Chinese characters, is
The same text in Simplified Characters (which I am using), is
It is possible that the author omitted the entire sub-entry 其汁煎之:[名]射罔,杀禽兽 which is about use in hunting, not in medicine. I should have tried this alternative too. I also should have tried to identify the drawings that appear on that image. The labels all use the 烏 "root" character, so character that literally means "crow", also used in the name of this SBJ entry (烏頭 literally "crow's head") They may include the other two types of aconite root, and/or other roots listed in the SBJ, and/or other roots added by the ZHB compiler. But the lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne... All the best, --stolfi RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Jorge_Stolfi - 06-07-2026 RE: A page from the ORIGINAL Voynich Manuscript - Jorge_Stolfi - 06-07-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - tavie - 06-07-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - rikforto - 07-07-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Jorge_Stolfi - 07-07-2026 RE: Why and how the text could be Bavarian - Jorge_Stolfi - 11-07-2026 RE: Why and how the text could be Bavarian - ololololo - 11-07-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - tavie - 11-07-2026 RE: Why and how the text could be Bavarian - Jorge_Stolfi - 12-07-2026 |