![]() |
|
The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Theories & Solutions (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-58.html) +--- Thread: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against (/thread-4746.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
|
RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Jorge_Stolfi - 15-07-2026 (14-07-2026, 11:29 PM)rikforto wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm not sure what exemplars you're looking at, but in the ones I see it definitely looks like 撇 (the down left stroke) crosses 横 (the horizontal one) to me. Indeed, even in Clerical Script there is always a "head" protruding above the horizontal line. But it can be quite short, about as long as one stroke-width. If those are indeed Chinese characters, note that they were copied by an Author who almost certainly never studied Chinese writing (so much so that he got them upside-down) and then re-copied by a Scribe who had never seen Chinese writing before. Thus it would be understandable if he omitted the "head". The middle horizontal stroke of capital letters A, E, H often crosses the legs and sticks out on the sides; but a copyist would not consider those protrusions significant, and would not feel obliged to reproduce them. Quote:No dictionary I've checked wants to go to bat for three strokes in the order implied by what's in the VMS, What do you mean? My dictionary says 大 is three strokes, and that is how I have learned to draw it: The VMS symbol, whatever it is, is supposed to be three brush strokes too. (Although the outline of this brushed symbol was drawn by the Scribe with a sharp quill, in brown ink, and then he or someone else filled that outline with rusty-red paint.) All the best, --stolfi RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - rikforto - 15-07-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - ReneZ - 15-07-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Jorge_Stolfi - 15-07-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - rikforto - 15-07-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - tavie - 15-07-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Jorge_Stolfi - 16-07-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Jorge_Stolfi - 16-07-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - conlangyalesbaby - 16-07-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Jorge_Stolfi - 16-07-2026 |