![]() |
|
The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Theories & Solutions (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-58.html) +--- Thread: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against (/thread-4746.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
|
RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - ololololo - 19-09-2026 Nothing wrong. Anyway, if these are hieroglyphs, the author redrew them purely for decoration. He didn’t know what they meant. The decorative nature is evident from the fact that they are inverted (i.e., the author didn’t attach much importance to their position) and from the fact that they are very much simplified (the largest bird glyph is too simple to be a specific hieroglyph). These may also be not specific characters, but parodies of them, which the author reproduced from memory. Something like You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Jorge_Stolfi - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - ololololo - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - chenxiang - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - JoJo_Jost - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Aga Tentakulus - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Jorge_Stolfi - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - ololololo - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - rikforto - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - ololololo - 19-09-2026 |