![]() |
|
The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Theories & Solutions (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-58.html) +--- Thread: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against (/thread-4746.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
|
RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - ololololo - 19-09-2026 Stolfi, if you don’t understand why I don’t consider the recipe a serious document, I’ll make a similar comparison. Let’s take the Carmen Arvale: Enos lases juvate Neve luae rue, Marma, sins incurrere in pleores Satur fu fere Mars. Limen sali. Sta. Berber. Semunis alternei advocapt conctos Enos, Marmor, juvato Triumpe triumpe triumpe triumpe triumpe. Oh my God! It seems I’ve found a comparison for triumpe! Let’s assume that qokedy is qokeedy written with a mistake. If you find any differences between your comparison and SBS, be sure to let us know. RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - chenxiang - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Jorge_Stolfi - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - chenxiang - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - chenxiang - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - JoJo_Jost - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - chenxiang - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - ololololo - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - Jorge_Stolfi - 19-09-2026 RE: The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against - eggyk - 20-09-2026 |