You have nothing uploaded at that Academia link.
Now that we have two citations from you, I would like to solicit an explanation for both how and why you've applied them. Is their relevance general, and liable to introduce arbitrary analyses that cannot be reproduced? Or do they entail similar rituals as to the ones you've identified? Is there a way to establish any connection between their text and drawings and what you've identified in the VM? This, rather than more unbacked assertions, was what I was hoping to find at the links you sent me. I will also reiterate that I see no evidence for the symbols you've identified. I could quite easily swap all the cells on your spreadsheet---or invent my own---and you have not justified any of those choices, so establishing the connection must be carefully done to avoid a circular or arbitrary argument
Possibly related to that, is there any evidence that the green/red/blue schema you've asserted actually identifies treatment? Yes, there are different colors through the herbology section, but I do not even understand how you expect me to verify the scheme you've given. What process should I be using? (And note, letting it "open up" to me was not reproducible, I already tried, and it did not do so.)
[/quote]
My papers are at that link - if you can't access them, that's a technical issue on your end. The colour coding is visually verifiable on every folio - open the manuscript and look. The video I'm making will show the full methodology. If after watching that you still have specific questions about the process, I'm happy to answer.
Now that we have two citations from you, I would like to solicit an explanation for both how and why you've applied them. Is their relevance general, and liable to introduce arbitrary analyses that cannot be reproduced? Or do they entail similar rituals as to the ones you've identified? Is there a way to establish any connection between their text and drawings and what you've identified in the VM? This, rather than more unbacked assertions, was what I was hoping to find at the links you sent me. I will also reiterate that I see no evidence for the symbols you've identified. I could quite easily swap all the cells on your spreadsheet---or invent my own---and you have not justified any of those choices, so establishing the connection must be carefully done to avoid a circular or arbitrary argument
Possibly related to that, is there any evidence that the green/red/blue schema you've asserted actually identifies treatment? Yes, there are different colors through the herbology section, but I do not even understand how you expect me to verify the scheme you've given. What process should I be using? (And note, letting it "open up" to me was not reproducible, I already tried, and it did not do so.)
[/quote]
My papers are at that link - if you can't access them, that's a technical issue on your end. The colour coding is visually verifiable on every folio - open the manuscript and look. The video I'm making will show the full methodology. If after watching that you still have specific questions about the process, I'm happy to answer.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)
