The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against
(28-02-2026, 08:48 AM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Something seems to have gone wrong with the Thai version. What I see is a phonetic rendering of the original Chinese.

I asked GAI and ChatGPT to correct each other's output, and they eventually converged to the following version.  I have removed the "-" to make the eventual comparison to the VMS more fair.  Unmarked syllables are tone 1, all the other tones should be explicitly marked 2-5.

Code:
(A) Kai2 thuek4 daeng: [gae2] ra du khao5 daeng, bam rung sang khan5, un2 that4 fai, ham3 lueat4, cham ra chit2, dap2 phit4, kan sing ap2 mong khon (B) Hua5:              [gae2] prap2 phi5 sat2 rai4 (C) Man:               [gae2] hu5 tuek2 (D) Sai5:              [gae2] pa sa5 wa4 mai3 yut2 (E) Phang phuet2 nai:  [gae2] thong4 sia5 thong4 ruan (F) Khi5 kai2 khao5:   [gae2] rok2 hiu5 nam4, khai2 wat4 nao5 ron4 (G) Khon5 pik2:        [gae2] gae2 lueat4 duean mai3 ok2 (H) Khai2 kai2:        []    dap2 phit4 ron4, phu phong fai, kan chak2; [pra2 sit2] pen khong5 sak2 sit2 dang am phan

Does it make more sense?

All the best, --stolfi
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
[+] 1 user says Thank You to Jorge_Stolfi for this post
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
[+] 1 user says Thank You to ReneZ for this post
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)