(11-12-2025, 02:25 PM)LisaFaginDavis wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.... That leaves the Rose, bound as is, and quires 15, 17, and 19 - the herbal bifolia in this section are almost certainly out of place and, as Stolfi noted, the pharma bifolia are likely singulions as well.
About Quire 15, it seems interesting that the four folios 87 (Botanical), 88 (Pharma), 89 (Pharma), 90 (Botanical) are so close in terms of bigram frequencies (as You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., PCA plot from the previous post in that thread). I am looking forward to seeing if Colin’s analysis confirms that those two bifolios are closely related….