Harvard physicist's take on the VMS
By the way: people who grew up with the Latin alphabet generally do not realize how bad it is.  It has too few letters, even for Latin or any Romance language.  The symbols have no logic -- why does F look like E, or Q look like O; why you add a belly to change P into B, but not to change F into V, or T into D, or S into Z?  Why does A need that horizontal bar?  Why are the upper and lower case versions of the same letter so different? Why are some letters wider than others?  Why is italic "a" different than Roman "a", and "g" different from "g"?  Diacritics sort of make sense, but they force a bigger interline spacing to leave room for capitals PLUS diacritics...

Those who claim that a constructed language would not copy features from existing ones mush agree that someone creating a new script for a language should NOT base it on the Latin alphabet...  Big Grin 

All the best, --stolfi
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
[+] 1 user says Thank You to Jorge_Stolfi for this post
Reply
Register or login to view the content
[+] 3 users say Thank You to RadioFM for this post
Reply
Register or login to view the content
[+] 2 users say Thank You to nablator for this post
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)