[split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov
#41
This is an interesting consideration, although the hypothetic stroke would be very short and immediately head over to the "m"'s ascender.

Yes we must not forget about that "round object". It should fit into the context somehow.

By the way, I noted that I accidentally deleted the old scan of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. from my PC and am left with the current Beinecke scan only. Could anybody please share the old scan?
Reply
#42
Register or login to view the content
[+] 2 users say Thank You to -JKP- for this post
Reply
#43
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#44
Register or login to view the content
[+] 1 user says Thank You to -JKP- for this post
Reply
#45
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#46
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#47
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#48
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#49
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#50
Register or login to view the content
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [split] Big f116v spillover thread. ololololo 101 16,000 Yesterday, 07:03 AM
Last Post: Koen G
  [split] Marginalia Latin script [GENERAL DISCUSSION] -JKP- 16 20,854 20-10-2026, 10:20 PM
Last Post: Carnby
  [split] Palaeography of f116v Aga Tentakulus 19 22,866 14-02-2021, 05:25 AM
Last Post: Aga Tentakulus

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)