21-10-2016, 10:53 AM
I represent all the "wide gallows" "the k" and "t", as well as a non-standard a selection gallows "f" and "p".
Your thoughts about these characters?
Figure 23 and 24 - the same glyph.
I ask to make the computer processing of the dedicated fragment of yellow in Figure 12. My opinion: on the left leg is a loop. If is the loop, there in the text at all is no the "broad gallows" "k".
There are a thread, which discusses why the is no double gallows? My suggestion:
Figure 38 - "p + p"
Figure 42 - "p + f"
Figure 28 - "f + t"
Figure 29 - "k + k"
In Figure 27, the author originally wanted to to write normal gallows "p", but then extended the line up and wrote "wide gallows" "p".
Your thoughts about these characters?
Figure 23 and 24 - the same glyph.
I ask to make the computer processing of the dedicated fragment of yellow in Figure 12. My opinion: on the left leg is a loop. If is the loop, there in the text at all is no the "broad gallows" "k".
There are a thread, which discusses why the is no double gallows? My suggestion:
Figure 38 - "p + p"
Figure 42 - "p + f"
Figure 28 - "f + t"
Figure 29 - "k + k"
In Figure 27, the author originally wanted to to write normal gallows "p", but then extended the line up and wrote "wide gallows" "p".
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)
