The 'Chinese' Theory: For and Against
@stolfi You didn't answer my question about Spaces (it probably got lost in the mix), so I took the initiative and asked Claude myself. Since it's AI, take the following with a grain of salt, but it's still interesting:

The VMS’s restriction to a few high-frequency token beginnings (Top 5 = 72%) and very few token endings (Top 5 = 91%) corresponds quantitatively to Chinese syllable phonotactics: approx. 19–20 initials and 3–5 codas in Mandarin around 1400. If each token = one syllable, the limited variety of initial and final glyphs is a necessary consequence of Chinese syllable structure and consistent with it.

I would like to emphasize that I don’t have the slightest knowledge of Chinese and therefore cannot verify this in any way....
Reply
Register or login to view the content
[+] 1 user says Thank You to Jorge_Stolfi for this post
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
[+] 1 user says Thank You to Stefan Wirtz_2 for this post
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
[+] 1 user says Thank You to kckluge for this post
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)